Talk:Gliese 581 planetary system

Article organisation
I came across this while patrolling new articles and I'm uncertain whether to click OK. Certainly the subject is notable enough for an article, but it is fairly comprehensively covered already in what are now the child articles to this one. Is the intention now to merge the individual planets into this article? I see that there has been some discussion in a similar direction already with no changes made. Or is there sufficient need for a summary as well as keeping the individual articles? Lithopsian (talk) 13:12, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gliese 581 planetary system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090521052641/http://obswww.unige.ch/~udry/Gl581_preprint.pdf to http://obswww.unige.ch/~udry/Gl581_preprint.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:46, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Merge with Gliese 581?
The article for the star Gliese 581 is too short to be a total, full-fledged page. While most of the things that are interesting about the star are the planetary system, they should nonetheless be shown in the actual article instead of being a redirect from the full page. TheWhistleGag (talk) 21:47, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I would definitely support this merge; no other exoplanetary system has separate articles on the system and the star. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 03:33, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Anyone else have opinions on this issue? TheWhistleGag (talk) 20:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Support: the primary article is of modest length and the subjects are closely interrelated. If Proxima Centauri, Epsilon Eridani, and Tau Ceti are combined articles, there's no reason this should be any different. Praemonitus (talk) 20:19, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Support Same reason as above. Kepler-1229b talk — Preceding undated comment added 17:39, 2 January 2021 (UTC)