Talk:Gliese 581c/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Davidbuddy9   Talk  04:06, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Reviewing this revision (click)

Review

 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * Pass
 * The lead paragraph is a nice read and it definitely seems to be polished.
 * The sub-section Mass (under Physical characteristics) says clarification needed. But I don't see how this could be clarified more the sentence makes sense and is understandable already. So remove the clarification needed tag.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):
 * Under Liquid Water, add that citation from MOST used in the second last paragraph in Radius That justifies no transits.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * Recent edits have been mostly constructive so far of all edits made in 2016 to this article only 1 edit has been flagged as vandalism or testing but the edit itself didn't seem like vandalism altough the space between 581 and c should be there.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by two images, all of which are WP:AIAO compliant.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: - Pass, polished lead, one citation that needs to be carried over and one tag needs to be removed.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: - Pass, polished lead, one citation that needs to be carried over and one tag needs to be removed.
 * Pass/Fail: - Pass, polished lead, one citation that needs to be carried over and one tag needs to be removed.


 * I have made all the fixes needed in this edit.  Davidbuddy9   Talk  04:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)