Talk:Glints (platform)

Recommendations
At a glance, the article is very concise with suitable and informative headings that makes is easier for readers to pick out what they're interested in. Here are the following strengths that we have picked out from the article and would like to commend the authors on.

Credible Source

The sources referenced to are all from reliable websites and thus, the information in the article are credible and this aligns with Wikipedia's position on being a trustworthy information source.

Clear Headings

The headings used are all succinct and straightforward. This give readers an idea of the flow of the article at a glance. Furthermore, the introduction paragraph was very well written and packed with all the necessary information to give readers what they first need to know about Glints before diving into the nitty gritty details of Glints. The History of Glint is very comprehensive as well as the authors mentioned the driving force behind the concept of Glints.

However, there are some areas that can be further improved on:

Order of Points

It would be clearer and more succinct if the Reception point was placed before features.

Business Model

Can be more elaborative and perhaps, use a business model template to further elaborate their idea such as the primary and secondary activites behind Glints. Since Glints is quite a successful online platform, there would be some areas that they place more focus on and these could be explained to give readers an idea of the business model that drove Glints to its success today.

Features

Images could be added under this heading to give readers a better idea of how the platform works. Furthermore, features such as the interactivity of the platform should be included as well since Glints is an interactive online platform. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dinnafana (talk • contribs) 03:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)