Talk:Global-is-Asian

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --58.182.204.176 (talk) 03:59, 19 April 2015 (UTC) It relates to the academic magazine of an internationally recognized School of Public Policy that is part of one the top universities of the world. You don't find subjective criteria in this article, which objectively describes the flagship magazine of a well known international institution. This is not matter of interpretation but matter of fact.

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --58.182.204.176 (talk) 04:29, 19 April 2015 (UTC)I believe that this article describes. It does not qualify. On the other hand the academic institutions involved are woldwide recognized. I see no reason for it to be deleted.

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --58.182.204.176 (talk) 05:56, 19 April 2015 (UTC) Why "Global Asia" magazine´s article is acepted by Wikipedia and "Global-is-Asian" is contested? Is it not a case of discrimination against the latter as both are magazines from two sibling schools of the National University of Singapore? If Wikipedia accepts the first article it should also accept the second. Perhaps the latter requires additional references but in no case should be deeted.
 * I've deleted this because ultimately the page was just a little too promotional-ish for Wikipedia but mostly because I don't see where the magazine is independently notable outside of the main organization. Since it's not a journal, WP:NJOURNALS doesn't cover this publication and notability is WP:NOTINHERITED by the magazine being part of a notable institution. I've redirected this to the section that covers the organization's publications, where it's already briefly mentioned. The thing about saying that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is that the existence of another, similar article doesn't mean anything. It could be that the other magazine passes notability guidelines in a way that this does not or it could just be that the other page hasn't been deleted just yet. If you want to nominate it for deletion, feel free. That's kind of the double edged sword here- by mentioning another publication that doesn't pass notability guidelines you're putting it at risk of getting deleted as well. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:01, 19 April 2015 (UTC)