Talk:Global Times

Chinese RSS Channels
There are a lots of chinese news sources, but those doesn't put their rss channels icon to the main page. Xinhua - yes, Business China - Business - yes, Economic Observer: Economic - yes, People's Daily Online: Business - yes, CNTV: World - yes.

The Shanghai RSS channel is not xml format. The other chinese sources should put an RSS icon, to thier Main page. Strange that the Sina english (and Global Times) don't have RSS channel, one of the best chinese news web page they write.

Missing RSS
Hello somebody ?! Can you make RSS channels to these chinese pages? THX. --Chinese RSS Channels (talk) 06:58, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * http://www.prnasia.com
 * Xinjiang http://www.truexinjiang.com
 * http://en.kunming.cn
 * China.org http://www.china.org.cn
 * PLA - http://english.pladaily.com.cn
 * http://www.china-defense-mashup.com/
 * Global Times globaltimes.cn
 * http://english.enorth.com.cn
 * Sina english - http://english.sina.com/
 * http://en.ce.cn
 * http://www.livemint.com
 * http://www.asianage.com
 * http://www.mathrubhumi.com/english
 * News center - http://news.china.com.cn

Dated article
Looks like the article hasn't been updated in awhile. Most sources come from right after the publication launched. Does anyone have some good sources to show its performance and reception in the last year or so? — Zujine |talk 17:17, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Global Times. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110625173319/http://globaltimes.cn/metro/MetroBeijing.aspx to http://www.globaltimes.cn/metro/metrobeijing.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110702111258/http://globaltimes.cn/metro/MetroShanghai.aspx to http://www.globaltimes.cn/metro/metroshanghai.aspx
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://headlines.yahoo.co.jp/hl?a=20110312-00000001-scn-cn
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131013005608/http://www.globaltimes.cn/NEWS/tabid/99/ID/663853/China-is-complicated.aspx to http://www.globaltimes.cn/NEWS/tabid/99/ID/663853/China-is-complicated.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Not representative of the Chinese government's position
The article in its current state describes the Global Times as a publication that focuses "on international issues from the Chinese government's perspective". This is not quite true: while the Global Times also undergoes Chinese state censorship, most reliable sources consider the Global Times to be a sensational tabloid that publishes inflammatory editorials that tend to be more aggressive than the official party line. Frequently, content in the Global Times is misinterpreted as the "voice of China" in Western publications, when the Global Times is not representative of the Chinese government's position.

Here are some sources, taken from :

—  Newslinger  talk   05:27, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

“Pompeo betrays Christianity with lies” contribution
I would like some Wikipedia contributors to assist with the following two paragraphs. They have been removed from this article twice, but I feel that they are relevant. An argument could be made that both editors made bad faith reverts. Nonetheless, I understand how people act.

First, both paragraphs were removed because somebody said it was my opinion. Consequently, I added the first paragraph, “According to MSNBC's Morning Joe program on May 5, 2020”. Next, both paragraphs were removed because somebody said it was a “very poorly worded phrase”. You can see in the page’s history.

I am not here to fight anybody or win an argument. I want what is best for Wikipedia and for the people that read it. Here are the two paragraphs in question. Please give me your feedback.

1.

According to MSNBC's Morning Joe program on May 5, 2020, in response to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s 2020 comments about the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) coming from a laboratory in Wuhan, China, the Global Times editorial board wrote an article highly critical of Pompeo’s Christian faith. The article called, “Pompeo betrays Christianity with lies” cites Christian doctrine and the Ten Commandments.  2.

The United States is blocking Americans from accessing the Global Times website and other .cn websites like Xinhuanet.cn (Xinhua News Agency) with a traditional web browser.

Jasonagastrich (talk) 07:19, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * You are misrepresenting the reason why your edit was first reverted - it was not "because somebody said it was my opinion", but (to quote myself from ) because you had failed to cite independent sources indicating wider reception of this opinion [regarding 1.], and for the blocking [regarding 2.]. You still have not done so.
 * Regards, HaeB (talk) 00:23, 11 May 2020 (UTC)


 * What is the blocking? The opinion was in the Global Times article. Did you read it? Furthermore, I cited the MSNBC program Morning Joe where they said the same thing. I think you are inserting your opinion. I would like to hear from somebody else that has not reverted my contribution.

Jasonagastrich (talk) 12:40, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Party title: CCP vs CPC
Is not the English title of a political party the English title it has registered itself? That would be Communist Party of China (CPC), Not CCP. CCP is inaccurate, isn't it 49.182.42.137 (talk) 11:17, 24 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia tends to use common names in the English language. In July, the discussion at concluded that the common name of the subject is Chinese Communist Party. Should the consensus on this matter change in the future, and the article be moved to Communist Party of China, other Wikipedia articles will also be amended to reflect that change. —  Newslinger   talk   10:12, 26 August 2022 (UTC)