Talk:Global Virus Network

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hprmartins. Peer reviewers: Aneesh1998, GSammarcoNEC.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Purple prose
The current version of the article reads like a PR release. While this is indeed an admirable and highly worthwhile cause worthy of our support, Wikipedia's editorial guielines do not allow us to say this in Wikipedia's own voice (see WP:NPOV), nor does it allow purple prose. Moreover, the current article completely lacks any citations third-party reliable sources, something needed to establish WP:NOTABILITY. Please could someone review and revise this article? -- The Anome (talk) 20:06, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
 * It was also a copyright violation of a couple of sources. I think GVN is notable, but they do seem to have an overactive press department. Espresso Addict (talk) 03:05, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Peer Review: Global Virus Network
All the information in this article is relevant to the topic stated. The article represents a neutral point of view and provides citation for all the informations that's being used in the article. for the most part the resources are fairly new, but some were from 2011. The publish date for the articles range from 2011-2015, there is no current information on the article. Most of the links listed on citation work but one link doesn't seem to be working. This particular article has very little information but I feel like the author just listed random sources based the amount of sources listed for the amount of information this article contains.