Talk:Global majority

Reliability of Medium Post
At the moment there is a reference to a Medium post which may be seen to fail the test of a WP:RS. However, it also comes up as cited by scholarly works through Google Scholar. Does this mean that it is reliable in context, based on WP:RS/AC or WP:UBO? I would normally not have a problem removing the Medium reference, but it helpfully elaborates on the historical binaries of POC, and no other reliable sources note this. But is that a moot point and is it still considered unreliable, despite contextual points? —Caorongjin 💬 09:16, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Global majority vs majority world
Hi, I recently redirected Majority World to this article, and included that as a synonym here, which was reverted by Caorongjin. So I thought about it a little more, and I think my changing of the redirect was probably a mistake, so I am planning on returning Majority World to Third world where it was originally targeted.

Caorongjin is correct that these are not the same thing: Majority World is a group of countries, while this article is about a group of people who belong to those countries, or whose ancestors likely originate from those countries. Caorongjin, would you agree? Thanks! Ironic (talk) 21:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Yup. Sounds about right to me. Perhaps worth also a Distinguish on both pages. —Caorongjin 💬 22:12, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Ironic (talk) 22:26, 11 July 2024 (UTC)