Talk:Global warming wager

I need help with this article
I'm working to expand this article, but I'm short on sources, so I would admire your help. Ahm2307 23:35, 24 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Honestly, this looks like a non-notable neologism, and much of the article is unsourced. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 19:36, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Merge to global warming controversy
Global warming has enough forks, this is over the top. This kind of material was/is noted where relevant at GW controversy and I don't see why this in particular warrants its own article. Oren0 (talk) 06:09, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Agree. In fact, I even wonder if this is notable enough for inclusion at all - "Global warming wager" Pascal -wikipedia turns up 62 hits only, and results for "Global warming wager" alone nearly always refer to normal betting about global warming. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 07:58, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I would support a delete as well. I just figured it'd be more civil to just merge any useful info from this page back into the GW controversy page. Oren0 (talk) 08:03, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete this page
I think this page should be deleted but User:JalenFolf you said that a redirect page cannot be deleted so easily. The section that it used to point to doesn't exist anymore and the term "wager" doesn't appear on that page. Maybe we could redirect to climate change denial but also there the term "wager" does not appear. I don't want to spend too much time on this; I think it would be the tidiest solution to simply delete the page. EMsmile (talk) 21:47, 29 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Again, this is an issue that needs to be brought to WP:RFD unless a completely different target can be found. Jalen Folf   (talk)  21:49, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't understand why you think it needs a discussion? To me it's a speedy deletion, no need to waste time discussing. But if you think it needs to be discussed, can you do the WP:RFD thing as I am not sure what would be involved exactly. EMsmile (talk) 21:53, 29 November 2023 (UTC)