Talk:Gloria Camiruagua

[Untitled]
Overall, the structure of the article is good. The way that the article has seperate topics in order to oraganize helps the readers to easily find and identify whatever information they may be looking for. All of the information in the article is only mentioned once leading to the article not sounding too wordy or repetitive because the information is not "fluffed up" with extra information. Overall, I did not notice any biased language in the article leading to it sounding very neutral.

The article can use a few improvements. First, the information is good, however it is a bit lacking in content. There is not too much information other than a few main points. There is not too much background. For example, under "art works" the name of the work is listed along with the date and medium. However, I believe the article can use a bit more information to along with it. Maybe by adding what art movement it belongs to, where it was displayed or what characterizes is, etc.. Similarly to the information posted under "tricolor". Another way to improve the quality of the article is by including more sources to make it more credible. Finding sources can be difficult but there are librarians available to assist students with finding more sources. They are a great resource that can be very useful.

All in all, the article looks good, unbiased, a few sources, and clearly structured. I would suggest looking into the library to find new resources to add more information and find more sources.

Jagui075 (talk) 22:28, 15 May 2019 (UTC)