Talk:Glossary of anarchism

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

No consensus to move. This is where it started and we need consensus to say that the proposed name is better. I don't see that here. If the move war continues, leave a note on my talk page. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:16, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Anarchist terminology → Glossary of anarchism – This article has twice been moved to Glossary of anarchism and has been moved back twice. While it is an page of Anarchist terminology it is also a glossary. Having the name as Glossary of anarchism is a bit more descriptive and also fits in with the naming scheme at Category:Glossaries. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:41, 30 July 2011 (UTC)


 * No, that is neither the intent nor the function of the article, and so would be a misdescription; a foolish consistency, the hobgoblin of little minds. If you don't have constructive material to add to the entry, I would respectfully ask that you leave it be.  Skomorokh   15:01, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move No 2

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved, since there seems to be no objection. While the move request was still open, the article was moved to Glossary of anarchism terms, but "terms" strikes me as redundant. Aervanath (talk) 18:32, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Anarchist terminology → Glossary of anarchism – per WP:CRITERIA, to suit convention and because it is a glossary. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 00:23, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Term for an anarchaic glossary
Surely a true anarchist would ignore standards and policies, and prefer to have a title that was inaccurate or inconsistent, or perhaps even both (at the cost of that being itself consistent)? Perhaps that is what we are seeing, it could explain a lot. <-;)

I note that on 1 March, within the discussion period of the latest requested move Anarchist terminology → Glossary of anarchism which was raised on 28 February, the article was moved to a third title Glossary of anarchism terms. Now that's anarchy in action. Andrewa (talk) 23:52, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Glossary of anarchism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080609103636/http://www.fluxeuropa.com/juenger-anarch.htm to http://www.fluxeuropa.com/juenger-anarch.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/19990117030925/http://flag.blackened.net/daver/anarchism/tucker/tucker2.html to http://flag.blackened.net/daver/anarchism/tucker/tucker2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Unmerge right-wing terms
It seems rather odd to have right-wing terms such as Non-Agression Principle mixed with left-wing terms like autonomism. The two philosophies are fundamentally different, as many left-wing anarchists have argued. I would argue that there should be a page for right-wing terms and left-wing terms, as this more accurately presents the reality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.169.20.249 (talk) 14:18, 11 January 2019 (UTC)