Talk:Glossary of sculpting

Transfer to Wiktionary and delete?

 * If this article were called List of sculpting terms, the question probably would not arise. This article should be regarded as a set of stubs.  Some have already achieved full article status, but most of the others will never be big enough to have an article of their own.  These are all encyclopaedic terms that deserve more than a simple dictionary definition. Keep - --Concrete Cowboy 18:52, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree with Concrete Cowboy that we should Keep this page. Glossaries on Wikipedia are integrated into Wikipedia - the links lead to Wikipedia articles.  Wiktionary glossary entries lead to Wiktionary articles.  Therefore glossaries can serve as navigation aids on both - this is not an either or issue.  Transwiki Wikipedia glossaries to your heart's content, but keep them on Wikipedia too.  Stop crippling Wikipedia by deleting its encyclopedia-linked triple-function glossaries.  Glossaries on Wikipedia serve as vocabulary learning aids and as topic identification lists and as navigation aids.  Keep 'em.     Th e Tr ans hu man ist   04:58, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message
--CopyToWiktionaryBot 16:46, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

I just removed this phrase
" or works while observing the subject"  from the "Direct carving" section because that is not how it works. Few models, especially animal ones, will sit still for the many, many, many hours, days or weeks that it takes to carve a work. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 05:19, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

What do folks here
think about "Ciment Fondu" & "Hydrocal?" It looks a lot like spam to me and it if looks like spam and tastes like spam................ Carptrash (talk) 15:41, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Do you know about Google? It's really rather good for finding out about unusual words. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 19:50, 29 October 2012 (UTC)