Talk:Glossop/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: / ƒETCH COMMS  /  02:23, 29 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Quick fail
 * There are many poorly sourced and unsourced sections. These include "Roman and Saxon", "Governance", "Geography", "Climate", "Economy", "Parish Church of All Saints", "Transport", "Schools and further education", "Culture", "Emergency service provision", "Twin town", "Literature and the media", and "Notable persons".
 * There are countless blatant MOS violations, such as the inclusion of external links mid-prose, and grossly inconsistent date formatting. The article has not undergone a significant copyedit recently and could really use one.


 * As the nominator has only edited this article once, is currently blocked, and the issues are too much to address in one week without being too hasty, I am quick-failing this nomination per Reviewing good articles. I strongly suggest that someone who is willing to put a good deal of effort into this article resolve these concerns, possibly go to peer review, and resubmit at GAN. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  02:35, 29 January 2011 (UTC)