Talk:Glutathione supplements

There was one reference to a website promoting the idea of some sort of a qualification of protein composition that seemed a bit questionable. It no longer appears. (Entropy7 (talk) 15:27, 9 September 2009 (UTC))


 * I was talking on wikimed and edit summaries about peer reviewed sources being misused. Most were not even on supplements but just on how glutathione works in biology or disease states etc. The article should not be restored in my opinion. Discussion is here.Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine.-- Literature geek |  T@1k?  17:04, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * We can't discuss an article content if it can't be improved, I was trying to do so! Thank you.--Nutriveg (talk) 17:13, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * If you are interested in writing about glutathione supplements (rather than the odd mix of compounds this article tried to link together) I suggest you start at Glutathione. Tim Vickers (talk) 17:16, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I would if the content in this page was merged there. By the conception you made from the article content, you seen to have failed to read the article introduction, it's not about a single substance but "compounds that naturally occur in food and have been shown to either increase glutathione levels or increase effectiveness of glutathione mediated processes".--Nutriveg (talk) 17:34, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * What cited source used that definition? Sources such as PMID 11953659 "Practicalities of glutathione supplementation in nutritional support." discuss supplementation of glutathione, through IV, oral or other routes, but only discuss supplements containing glutathione. Tim Vickers (talk) 17:36, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The article content, the chosen title may not be the best, but content looks relevant to deserve something else than simple deletion by people who couldn't connect the content with the introduction.--Nutriveg (talk) 17:51, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * So you agree that no cited source used that definition. As it stood, the article was therefore original research. If you think you might be able to rewrite this content to deal with a different topic, whatever this might be, I'd be happy to copy it to User talk:Nutriveg/Glutathione and glutathione metabolism-related compounds and products, where you could edit at your leisure. Tim Vickers (talk) 17:56, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * It's unlikely that exact term was used but that subject defined by the definition looks appropriate. I've already started to do so, but after so many people deleting my contributions and making shallow analysis I don't feel motivated to continue on this topic right now, maybe those so called experts, that are very "helpful" when it comes to criticizing others contribution can now have an opportunity to do something else.--Nutriveg (talk) 18:50, 9 September 2009 (UTC)