Talk:Glycerite

Pseudoscience?
This article looks like a psuedo-science advertisement for TincTract brand botanicals. [posted by previous IP]


 * I agree: distinctions without a difference when it comes the "origin" of the chemical.


 * One example: ...and are reputed to have antifreeze properties to -46.5 (°C) with an estimated shelf-life in excess of 20 years. All glycerin has antifreeze properties and it's not in dispute -- even if manufactured in the lab or as a byproduct of diesel production !!! You don't need fish as the article implies. And the technology is not new, it's old. Except for one thing -- the unattested claim of -46.5 instead of the conventional -38 as reported on the antifreeze page. See glycerin, antifreeze.


 * The tone of the whole article is (1) advertisement, (2) pseudoscientific, (3) undocumented. Just read it !! It is among the worse I've seen, among hundreds of articles on Wikipedia in the last few months. I would encourage people to peck it to death. 89.217.12.52 (talk) 21:12, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Glycerite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071012040650/http://newhope.com/nutritionsciencenews/NSN_backs/Apr_99/backtalk.cfm to http://www.newhope.com/nutritionsciencenews/NSN_backs/Apr_99/backtalk.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:41, 20 October 2017 (UTC)