Talk:GoJet Airlines

Controversy section
An IP removed the controversy section, and I support his edit because the section was not referenced and may have been false. Shalom Hello 02:17, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

I am an airline pilot, what was written in the "controversy" section is possible true. The pilots that work there are top-rated by the rest of the industry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mnalpha (talk • contribs) 23:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Above comment is only opinion and not based in fact. 199.227.166.10 (talk) 05:32, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Nope it is fact, another airline pilot chiming in here. Gojet pilots are considered scabs, and are the bottom of the bottom feeders. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mnalpha (talk • contribs) 16:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Doesn't mean he/she knows what he/she is talking about. GoJet pilots are NOT considered scabs by anyone who actually knows what that term means. 65.82.226.242 (talk) 01:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I agree that there seems to be a controversy, but I'd like to clarify a few things With those points in mind, I'd like to see the "Controversy" section revived in a proper form for wikipedia. Davidyorke (talk) 20:22, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Unless the term "scab" is being used in the "contemptible person" sense (which isn't very precise use of the language) then GoJet pilots are not scabs.  They belong to IBT and are not breaking any strike. "Scab" definition
 * 2) Whether or not Trans States Holdings (the parent of TSA and GoJet) is engaging in unfair labor practices vis-a-vis the "Alter Ego Doctrine", there has been no complaint to the NLRB that I can find.
 * 3) All Wikipedia content must be verifiable, have a neutral point of view, and not be original research.  Just stating your own observations or what you've heard from unreliable sources is not what wikipedia is here for.

Not to beat a dead horse here but the pilots working at GoJets are not scabs but they ARE considered to be scum by every pilot working at a regional airline and most pilots working for major airlines. I would know this since I am a regional airline pilot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Salukipilot4590 (talk • contribs) 00:41, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

New ATC Callsign
New ATC Callsign is LINDBERGH per listening to O"hare Approach on 01 OCT 2007 on Liveatc.net Dougsnow 13:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on GoJet Airlines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130508152848/http://www.gojetairlines.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=26&Itemid=69 to http://www.gojetairlines.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=26&Itemid=69
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111101052528/http://www.stocksandshares.tv:80/weekly-news-roundup-delta-air-lines-nysedal-24/32013470 to http://www.stocksandshares.tv/weekly-news-roundup-delta-air-lines-nysedal-24/32013470
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130509140645/http://www.gojetairlines.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=29&Itemid=72 to http://www.gojetairlines.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=29&Itemid=72

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:01, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Separation of CRJ-700 and CRJ-550
I noticed that both of these aircraft are listed under the CRJ-700. Shouldn’t they be separated seeing how they are certified as two different aircraft? CZ3699 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:56, 27 February 2020 (UTC)