Talk:Go Missin'/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 15:38, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

✅ From all the articles I've read, he's only credited as the producer. Usher's SoundCloud page also doesn't list Diplo as a featured artist, for example, for "Lemme See" Rick Ross is mentioned in its title as featured. ✅ ✅
 * Info box
 * Add a caption for the artwork
 * The artwork has Diplo on it, is he a featured artist??
 * Genres should be in alphabetical order
 * Remove the album, recorded and writer parameters, there's no point them being there

✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ Hmmm, I don't know. The lead complies with WP:LEADLENGTH, and I feel like one paragraph just appears cluttered.
 * Lead
 * "Go Missin'" is a song recorded by American singer Usher, produced by Diplo. Released on February 14, 2013 through SoundCloud as a free download, the track was released on Valentine's Day, as was the Diplo helmed "Climax", which was released as the lead single from Usher's seventh studio album, Looking 4 Myself (2012). → "Go Missin'" is a song recorded by American singer-songwriter Usher. It was produced by Diplo and was released on Valentine's Day 2013 through SoundCloud as a free download. The year before, Usher released "Climax" on Valentine's Day, the lead single from his seventh studio album, Looking 4 Myself (2012).
 * The singer announced through his Twitter "You loved what I gave you last Valentine's #Climax So here is 'Special delivery from the cloud'Happy [sic] Valentine's Day!". → Prior to its release, the singer tweeted that he had a "special delivery from the cloud" for his fans as they liked how he released "Climax" on Valentine's Day the year before.
 * critics → music critics
 * , noting similar musical elements to "Climax". → This is repetition, you can remove it.
 * Make the lead one paragraph, it's not long enough for two.

✅ Removed plural. ✅ ✅ ✅
 * Critical response
 * Brown described the tracks as to be → tracks? What other tracks?
 * noted the collaboration as → described the collaboration as
 * with the track containing → and thought that the track contained a
 * though praised → though he praised


 * References
 * These are perfect

A pretty short article but it's well written. On hold for 7 days. — AARON  &bull; TALK   12:56, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Status
 * Thanks for reviewing, I've addressed your points, bar the last one for the lead.  Et 3  rnal  16:58, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay. I personally think that the second one is too short and the lead looks sparser overall. Having it as one paragraph makes it look fuller. But I'll overlook it this time. Passing. —  AARON  &bull; TALK   23:15, 9 April 2013 (UTC)