Talk:Go to the Future/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 07:02, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

this review is pending from a long time. Are you going to do it? — Indian: BIO  [ ChitChat  ] 06:29, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Comments
 * Any reason for the two specific citations in the lead? Ordinarily the facts in the lead should be expanded upon in the main body and that's where they can be cited.
 * Typically with an album or single article I've always put a source after the lead sentence, but I suppose I don't really need to! Done.


 * "made up of " -> "comprising"
 * Fixed.


 * You link techno in the infobox but not in the prose.
 * Fixed.


 * "Kusakari was originally in" no need to so quickly repeat her surname.
 * Replaced with 'she'.


 * "and "Shiranami Top Water" managed to chart " just "and "Shiranami Top Water" charted " would be tighter.
 * Done.


 * Sapporo is linked in the image caption in the section after which it is first mentioned.
 * Removed, but I thought that image captions generally linked to the subjects they depict as they're not a part of the continuous text flow.


 * "sound the core of Sakanaction's sound" bit repetitive.
 * Fixed.


 * " song "Mikazuki Sunset".[22] "Mikazuki Sunset" was" again, repetitive prose.
 * Fixed.


 * "album then" when is "then"? At the moment of the lossless release, shortly afterwards, something else?
 * Clarified.


 * " managed to reach number" again, just tighter to say "reached number".
 * Fixed.


 * Track lengths don't add up to length. I guess there's filler gaps?
 * Strange! It's the time listed in the Tower source which is generally based on what the record company says, but the iTunes times add up differently.


 * Sortable charts table is (a) pointless and (b) doesn't work properly as it moves the second heading!
 * Fixed.


 * I'm loathe to see empty cells in tables, so if information is not available, use N/A or N/A perhaps.
 * Done, though I don't think I've ever seen an n/a cell in a release history box before.

I'll place on hold, apologies for the delay in the review. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:33, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * How's the article now? --Prosperosity (talk) 04:18, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, improved and easily meets the GA criteria, so I'll pass. Good work.  The Rambling Man (talk) 09:53, 31 August 2015 (UTC)