Talk:God: The Failed Hypothesis

Neutrality
There is a problem with the selection of the material on this page. There is also a problem with notability. Reads like an ad. Wikidās ॐ 00:02, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Haha, yeah, right. A neutral summary of a book is an "ad". Just because you dissagree with it doesn't make it wrong. --84.130.171.41 (talk) 03:22, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

The abstract feelings about a page are welcome, but it can be more important to provide concrete examples. What sentences are you saying need changing. What material was not selected that should be selected - what is it missing? Perhaps a Reception section, I imagine.- Tesseract2 (talk) 18:36, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

New York Times bestseller
I temporarily removed this from the lead. The convention is to source the number on the list and cite it. Viriditas (talk) 20:49, 15 November 2022 (UTC)