Talk:God Damn Evil (album)

Contested deletion
This redirect should not be speedy deleted as an implausible typo or misnomer, because it's not a misnomer. This was created before the fact, and it did not need to be deleted in the first place. Editors often create "(album)" before an article is made at the simplest space, and they don't ordinarily end up deleted, nor do they need to be. "God Damn Evil" could end up meaning something else, and somebody may believe the topic needs disambiguation and type it in. This was already deleted once and I disagree with its deletion. It is often a reason brought up at RFD that readers may not know how much disambiguation a title needs, so "(album)" and "([artist] album)" are valid redirects and I don't see them deleted often, if at all. Reviewing admin, as it was already restored, please tell Walter Gorlitz to either let it go, or take it to WP:RFD.  Ss  112   18:14, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Of course it it. It was created before knowing that this is no need for a disambiguator. It was unnecessarily created and if this is allowed to stand, I will be disruptive over it as explained on Ss112's talk page. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:24, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * As for the edit summary comment, I nominate them for deletion. And if they can be unnecssarily created before the fact that none is needed, they can be created after the fact just as DAB song titles that will never see the light of day can be created. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:25, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * You will be disruptive over it? I don't think so, and you never said any such thing on my talk page. If another editor removes your template, you will be taking it to WP:RFD as that is what you do in the case your speedy deletion template is removed, or I will report you to an administrator for being disruptive, and I'd like to see you try to disregard an admin's actions. Seriously, you actually have the attitude that you think you can get away with doing anything around here. Well, news flash, Walter: you can't, so stop acting like it. I created this before God Damn Evil had an article, and I restored it because I disagreed with its deletion. It's not a misnomer whatsoever.  Ss  112   19:38, 21 May 2018 (UTC)


 * I have declined the CSD request. If there is continued doubt about the appropriateness of the redirect, WP:RFD is that way. On a side note, Walter, please don't make those kinds of threats. I know that discussion can get heated in content disputes, but that kind of talk is not constructive. Thanks. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:52, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Not a threat. It's a promise. Cheers. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:27, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Walter I think you need to take a deep breath and walk away from this for a little bit. I am giving you that advice formally in my capacity as an admin. -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:35, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I will take it under advisement. But as it is you don't know what I have planned, perhaps your advice is premature. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:39, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, when you threaten to behave disruptively, that's generally enough for a word of caution. Again, I advise you to step back. Threatening disruptive behavior is itself a specie of disruptive editing. -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:47, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Can you show me editors who have been blocked for threatening disruptive behaviour? I have seen many ANI discussions where the points made by admins and community members are that blocks are not retributive or preventative. Also, I have seen dozens of vandalism reports and SPIs go without action because there has been no action. I'd be happy to discuss that sort of thing, but this isn't the right forum. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:42, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't believe I have blocked you, or threatened to do so. But I do stand by my advice and observations above. Now I am going to move along unless there is some compelling reason not to. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:31, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I didn't claim you had, but I did imply that I have not seen any blocks or action for threatening to do something, aside from legal threats. Glad you're moving on. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:07, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Nominating for deletion is definitely wrong and I support this remaining so that other editors can contribute and refine and improve it which is in line with Wikipedia guidelines. As for the threat to be disruptive and the general sarcastic tone taken by Walter Gorlitz, this is a violation of the spirit of Wikipedia and such communication is unacceptable in this community. I will support any moves that are taken to limit the access and editing privileges currently available to Walter Gorlitz. 1.128.104.237 (talk) 10:38, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for you comment. However I believe that the matter has been settled for now. -Ad Orientem (talk) 13:32, 22 May 2018 (UTC)