Talk:Golaniad


 * Most people (as shown by the following elections) considered

weasel words.


 * that the requirements were unrealistic, given that even most of the opposition leaders were former party members (for instance, becoming a University professor practically required party membership).
 * Therefore, many saw the demonstration as just another way of creating political pressure before the elections, and

weasel words.


 * lack of respect for the majority oppion after the elections.

POV.


 * Not at all, this is objective, as measured by ellection results.Dpotop 11:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Saying that it was "a lack of respect" is POV. Anyway, in Bucharest, FSN got something like 60% of the votes. bogdan 11:53, 11 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The demonstration was also highly disruptive, as it blocked for months one of the main transport routes of the city.

POV. bogdan 21:04, 10 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Not at all. It's one of the most important traffic points in Bucharest.Dpotop 11:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Rephrase it. "highly disruptive" is POV.


 * Again, the previous positions must be put in perspective, as, for instance, Octavian Paler had been a highly-ranked Communist official for decades (and most other had been party members, too).

A small part of the protesters were ex-Communists. So what? I don't see the point. bogdan 21:06, 10 January 2006 (UTC)


 * A large part, as explained on your page. And the problem is one of credibility: Changing the system is not a competition in who is changing its affiliation first. Dpotop 11:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)


 * This was a student-lead protest. Their main leader was Munteanu. I don't what is the problem with the credibility ? Just because they were supported by some ex-communists? They were also supported by Eugen Ionescu. bogdan 21:55, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

To Voievod
Sorry, I did not intend to delete your contribs. I was a bit angry over Bogdan's wholesale revert. :) Dpotop 11:49, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Removed text

 * Cetrain other consider that its requirements were unrealistic, 

weasel words


 * given that most of the opposition leaders were former party members, as earlier explained.

False. Neither Radu Câmpeanu nor Ion Raţiu were party members.


 * In this direction, the Golaniad is viewed as just another way of creating political pressure before the elections, and lack of respect for the majority oppion after the elections.

lack of respect? who are you to judge? This is as POV as it can get.


 * The demonstration also was disruptive, as it blocked for months one of the main transport routes of the city. The continuation of a demonstration aimed at changing the government even after the elections was also seen by certain Romanians as non-democratic.

weasel words + POV. bogdan 21:52, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:University Square Bucharest 1990.jpg
Image:University Square Bucharest 1990.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Hoodlum? Seriously?
What about punk? What about "thug"? I don't think hoodlum is the best translation. I'd go with hooligan but then the song isn't as good because it says "mai bine huligan" and then "mai bine golan" but this nuance here is difficult to translate into English.

But hoodlum? Is this the 1930's, guys? Let's go with "thug". "Better a thug than an activist, better dead than a communist." goes the song. Of course "activist" here refers specifically to the nomenklatura. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.112.87.244 (talk) 22:38, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Golaniad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050427233309/http://www.revista22.ro/html/index.php?art=445&nr=2003-05-12 to http://www.revista22.ro/html/index.php?art=445&nr=2003-05-12
 * Added tag to http://greenengine.net/music/ImnulGolanilor.mp3
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050907020118/http://alegeri.resurse-pentru-democratie.org/cdep_1990.php to http://alegeri.resurse-pentru-democratie.org/cdep_1990.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:33, 20 October 2017 (UTC)