Talk:Gold Standard (carbon offset standard)

Comments
arbitrary rubbish from people who chose their own self interest.CorvetteZ51 10:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * As opposed to those who let other people choose their self interest for them? --Turbothy 21:29, 2 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Turbothy (talk • contribs)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on CDM Gold Standard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100413161345/http://goldstandard.apx.com/ to http://goldstandard.apx.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:38, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 11 November 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. Jenks24 (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

CDM Gold Standard → Gold Standard – This organization and standard have been renamed according to its Website, http://goldstandard.org. 69.202.129.134 (talk) 20:14, 11 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Oppose – that target is taken, and is ambiguous. Dicklyon (talk) 03:12, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose - not what a reader would expect. Full name of the standard seems to be Gold Standard for the Global Goals. Might be a better destination. -- Netoholic @  07:13, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose this topic is clearly not the gold standard of this topic. -- 70.51.45.76 (talk) 04:29, 15 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 22 August 2018

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Withdrawn. No support for renaming to this, including by me, the person suggesting. 69.202.129.134 (talk) 14:50, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

CDM Gold Standard → Gold Standard for the Global Goals – Standard has been renamed from CDM Gold Standard to "Gold Standard for the Global Goals," as pointed out in earlier discussion. https://www.goldstandard.org/blog-item/announcing-gold-standard-global-goals. 69.202.129.134 (talk) 16:33, 22 August 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 20:27, 29 August 2018 (UTC) --Relisting.  Brad  v  19:38, 13 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Support CDM Gold Standard is an outdated name for this standard. Gold Standard for the Global Goals seems to be the appropriate new name, according to the definitive source. 2607:F470:8:52:6D2A:52CF:9771:F9D7 (talk) 14:00, 5 September 2018 (UTC) Oppose Recognize that common names are preferable to official names, and Gold Standard for the Global Goals is not the common name. 108.4.229.116 (talk) 15:48, 19 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Oppose I proposed this move initially, but it seems actually like Gold Standard for the Global Goals is a brand name that's not commonly in use. Per |article titling policy, common names are preferable to official names. A better title may be "Gold Standard (carbon certification standard)". 69.202.129.134 (talk) 22:50, 9 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.