Talk:Goldenheart/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 14:56, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

I'll be glad to take this review. Initial comments to follow in the next 1-3 days. Thanks in advance for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:56, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Dan, on first pass, this looks like excellent work. I'm sorry this was allowed to sit in the GA queue for so long, when it seems to need so little work before passage. I've made a few tweaks as I went; feel free to revert any with which you disagree. I'll begin the checklist now. -- Khazar2 (talk) 21:42, 28 April 2013 (UTC)


 * No problem with the wait; these articles aint going nowhere, LOL. I think this line needs punctuation to delineate the citation, and this shouldn't use a present participle. Otherwise, good looks for the review. Dan56 (talk) 00:20, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * It's not a big deal either way, but I don't think the MOS calls for extra punctuation to be added to the sentence to set off a footnote. The first example in MOS:PUNCTFOOT is grammatically comparable to the sentence in question and doesn't add the extra comma:
 * "Example: Flightless birds have a reduced keel[10] and smaller wing bones than flying birds of similar size.[11][12]".
 * Either way, thanks again for all your work on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:32, 29 April 2013 (UTC)