Talk:Goldsea

Cited by others
Can't really say I like any wording of this. Generally such statements just suggest they are there to try and make a case for notability (still better than "x is notable for y" type statements which seem to crop up from time to time, rather than being apparent from the text why they are "interesting"). The idea of widely is just going too far into the my opinion is it's wide, whilst the sometimes cited seems rather limp. Can't think of anything better so not going to try and change it, but there has to be something better. --82.7.40.7 (talk) 20:19, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * You're right, of course: that sentence is only present because this article won't survive in the mainspace without an evidence-based assertion of notability. I'm not overenamoured of the wording either.— S Marshall  T/C 20:53, 16 November 2010 (UTC)