Talk:Golf Story/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ImaginesTigers (talk · contribs) 13:01, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Tagging this one. Except the full review to be posted on Wednesday (rather than in chunks). ImaginesTigers (talk) 13:01, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi, Lee. Let's get this show on the road. ImaginesTigers (talk) 13:33, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria This should be fairly straightforward. A few minor concerns. ImaginesTigers (talk) 13:33, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * A few suggestions (see Prose). I've implemented all but one of them. Structurally, the article is in good shape. ImaginesTigers (talk)
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * Copyvio is down, but will revisit later.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Prose

 * From the lead: Originally designed as a Wii U game, it was later released for the Switch due to a lengthy development time and gained assistance from Nintendo to create the game. The subject of this sentence isn't clear. "It was later released for the Switch [...] and gained assistance from Nintendo". Minor re-jiggling needed.
 * I've made a reword. I'll agree it is a bit of an odd phrase. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 16:21, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Also from the lead: critics praising the games' tone, should be game's.
 * A sequel is currently in development for the Switch, named Sports Story with [...] -> A sequel, Sports Story, is currently in development.
 * [...] originally in development as a Wii U title by Sidebar Games' -> Sidebar Games ImaginesTigers (talk) 13:33, 20 October 2020 (UTC)


 * This was a straightforward one after all. Promoting. ImaginesTigers (talk) 20:00, 20 October 2020 (UTC)