Talk:Gone Too Soon/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi, I'll be reviewing this article. The rules for GA reviews are stated at Good Article criteria. Feel free to respond to my comments under each one, and please sign each response, so that it's clear who said what.

When an issue is resolved, I'll mark it with ✅. If I think an issue remains unresolved after responses / changes by the editor(s), I'll mark it ❌. Occasionally I decide one of my comments is off-target, and strike it out --  Aaroncrick  ( talk ) 09:30, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I look forward to your comments. :)  Pyrrhus  16 ''' 10:10, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Coverage

 * No obvious gaps. 21:55, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Prose

 *  Aaroncrick  ( talk ) 10:22, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Verifiability

 *  Aaroncrick  ( talk ) 10:22, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Links validity check

 * ❌ per
 * Two links not working.  Aaroncrick  ( talk ) 10:22, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Fixed dead links.  Pyrrhus  16 ''' 10:39, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Check for disambiguation and other dubious wikilinks

 * ❌ per
 * Prelude
 * The Telegraph  Aaroncrick  ( talk ) 10:22, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Fixed both disambigs.  Pyrrhus  16 ''' 10:39, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Other comments
Absolutely superb. Nothing I can find that can be fixed.  Aaroncrick  ( talk ) 10:39, 16 September 2009 (UTC)