Talk:Gong Zai Mian

Merger proposal
I propose that Gong_Zai_Mian be merged into Instant_noodle. The content in Gong_Zai_Mian article adds a limited amount to what is already explained in the context of Instant_noodle. 101.164.16.5 (talk) 05:18, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Indeed. It's also the same thing, just in another language (WP:CFORK). And... considering the copyvio and all the unreferenced text (and the one cited text is not supported by the reference), I wouldn't even bother to merge it rather than just redirect/delete it to be honest. --Cold Season (talk) 04:06, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Continuing copyright issues
This article began as a copy of and remains an unauthorized derivative work of that source. For an example of close paraphrasing, consider the following:

The article says:

I have added bold to show where content is copied exactly. What's been done here is changing a few words and adding a few words. This is not an acceptable form of paraphrase on Wikipedia. There are other passages that similarly follow too closely.

The article says:

Again, adding a few words and changing a few words is not "rewriting" for the purposes of eliminating copyright problems.

While facts are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation - including both structure and language - are. So that it will not constitute a derivative work, this article should be rewritten. The essay Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism".

Alternatively, if the material can be verified to be public domain or permission is provided, we can use the original text with proper attribution. Please let me know at my talk page if you have questions about this. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:12, 13 April 2014 (UTC)