Talk:Good (film)

Good
Details, people? Nobisdom (talk) 05:04, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

the spelling needs work —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.34.87.242 (talk) 05:19, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Good
The Author of this article in the plot section say's that "Eventually Halder gives in to Nazism in order to advance his career." I do not believe that he gives into the Nazi Party to further his career. It seemed to me that he was basically forced into the position. His character is very passive and averse to conflict hence the hallucinations during a time of extreme conflict. Therefore he could not say no to the party when told to join. Actually I think he probably would have been imprisoned or killed (like many Germans that did not play ball) if he did not join. That was my feeling anyway.

Good movie. This demonstrates how 12% of a population of sociopaths was able to move a whole population to despicable and unspeakable atrocities.

TitusCicero (talk) 22:25, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Bad movie. Utter dross. Ss guy in black ceremonial uniform with swastika armband at end of film? People pick up on that kind of bad historical nonsense these days. 1812ahill (talk) 01:26, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

In the camp
Does he really see his friend or is he hallucinating? --Error (talk) 23:58, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

He is hallucinating, just watched it. When he goes up to him, it turns out it's someone else. Also, he is not working at the camp, he finds out which camp his friend was sent to and visits it under he pretext of his work - in order to find his friend. (67.90.234.94 (talk) 06:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC))

Good: references
I've removed the reference under "External links", because the "official website" no longer exists as of this writing (24.09.12). However, I don't know how to do it at the references (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_%28film%29#References).

Perhaps a seasoned Wikipedian will oblige. Ajarmitage (talk) 09:17, 24 September 2012 (UTC)