Talk:Good Enough (Evanescence song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 23:56, 3 October 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I see lots of linking of common terms. Per WP:OVERLINK, country names (Hungary) and common objects (mirror, diary, bookcase, etc.) shouldn't be linked. Beware of contractions that aren't in quotes. I've removed a few instances of both but there are more in there. Also, you shouldn't have a section with just one subsection (in this case, Controversy). There should be no subsections or 2+, but not one.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * When you say it was scheduled for release in 2011, do you mean 2007?
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 'Controversy' is an inherent violation of WP:NPOV, and there isn't really any controversial about it either. It might be simplest to just remove the subsection heading; it won't affect/disrupt the flow at all.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * File:Ge-caption.jpg needs an improved fair use rationale. It's not enough to say that it helps the reader; it helps in what way? What makes it indispensible? You can relate it commentary, criticism, production, etc, but it does need some sort of rationale.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Holding for improvements to be made. Melicans (talk, contributions) 23:56, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Holding for improvements to be made. Melicans (talk, contributions) 23:56, 3 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Is it good enough now? My love is love (talk) 00:09, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, it looks excellent. Great work! :-) Melicans (talk, contributions) 00:24, 4 October 2011 (UTC)