Talk:Goodbye, Michael/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.'' Reviewer: Guy546 ( Talk ) 19:47, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.
 * I'm not sure what makes this a reliable source, as it seems to be a fansite and only has a general summary of the article and not the entire plot of the article that it is referenced to.
 * Now satisfactory.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Just needs one tiny reference fixed then it is ready to be a GA. Guy546 ( Talk ) 20:09, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

I believe it is now ready NoD&#39;ohnuts (talk) 22:21, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Good work. Guy546 ( Talk ) 02:53, 1 May 2011 (UTC)