Talk:Goodbye (Glee)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (talk · contribs) 08:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Nice job! We needs more eye candy, and do we have a better photo of Estefan? ;)  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  08:59, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
 * There weren't really any great ones over at Wikimedia Commons. Any opinions on what's there? One in profile wasn't so bad (she was singing), but it would have been looking off the right side of the page. I figure we ought to have a Finn/Rachel diptych. I may go out looking to see if I can find a Single Ladies from the tour last summer. But all that's for much later today. ;-) BlueMoonset (talk) 09:11, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Turned out that there was a better one on Wikimedia Commons, just not on the Gloria Estefan page. (Her category, yes; page, no.) So I've used it. Added the Finn/Rachel diptych in the middle of Critical reception, but can't find anything to fit Music. My first choice would have been O'Malley, but the only picture of him is crap. Next choice was a "Single Ladies" with Kurt et al., but the only one I could find wasn't good enough to use. None of the other pieces reviewed really lend themselves to a picture except "Roots Before Branches", and there aren't any pictures available for Room for Two (aka Adam and Nikki Anders). I just didn't think a picture of Madonna (for Kurt's song) or even of them two of them was appropriate under the circumstances.


 * Did a major chop to Plot (it was 612 words), and a few other edits here and there; you'll want to recheck those sections. Thanks again! BlueMoonset (talk) 19:59, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Very good...and Gloria was never lovelier! ;)  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  07:44, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you! BlueMoonset (talk) 15:23, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Goodbye (Glee) passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: