Talk:Goodwin model (economics)

I've changed things like
 * $$ \frac{dv}{dt}/v$$
 * $$ \frac{dv}{dt}/v$$

to
 * $$\frac{dv/dt}{v}.$$
 * $$\frac{dv/dt}{v}.$$

As far as I know the style manuals (especially WP:MOSMATH) don't say one or the other should be used, and I can imagine that one's preferences in this could reasonably depend on context. But I think if the former format is preferred, it should appear like this:
 * $$ \left.\frac{dv}{dt}\right/v. $$
 * $$ \left.\frac{dv}{dt}\right/v. $$

Michael Hardy (talk) 00:35, 2 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Personally I like the v-dot/v notation, but haven't been able to figure out how to do it.radek (talk) 01:28, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Econometrics
I remember Desai looking at data, and not finding much evidence for this model (or against this model). Some mention of empirical work would be useful. Kiefer.Wolfowitz (Discussion) 21:06, 17 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I don't really know about the empirical work done with this model. It is a bit outdated and a bit of a curiosity - a very interesting curiosity IMO and it seems too stylized to lend itself to easy testing (similar to Lotka Voltera in biology.Volunteer Marek (talk) 07:13, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Link not working

 * http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/essays/multacc/goodw2.htm Discussion of the model at CEPA History of Economic Thought website] --Alex1011 (talk) 15:47, 29 May 2011 (UTC)