Talk:Google DeepMind

History link to Gatsby wrong
The current link for the Gatsby unit is wrong. Tried to replace with hyperlink to its homepage http://www.gatsby.ucl.ac.uk but defeated by syntax. May be someone can fix the error? Bill — Preceding unsigned comment added by W102102 (talk • contribs) 11:43, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Next acquisition: NHS patient data
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2086454-revealed-google-ai-has-access-to-huge-haul-of-nhs-patient-data --91.10.33.46 (talk) 21:14, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 12 September 2016

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved as uncontroversial. SST flyer  05:05, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Google DeepMind → DeepMind – Name of the company has changed, see website. Now operating under the Alphabet holding company, Google branding has been dropped. – Acopyeditor (talk) 22:39, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:35, 12 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Do you have a recent news source that indicates this? — Andy W. ( talk  · ctb) 22:41, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Not a news article, but founder Demis Hassabis announced the relaunch of the website a few days ago on Twitter, and they have dropped the Google logo, and in the "About" section they now refer to the company as "DeepMind" only and not "Google DeepMind". https://deepmind.com/about Acopyeditor (talk) 22:55, 11 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Company?
Is it really a "company", or was it really started as one? Most of the work they do on WaveNet is open source, and their website reads more like they're a non-profit research institute. I hardly know of any company whose research department is as fully transparent and accessible to the public and their results and working materials all published as open source. --2003:EF:13C6:FE22:9877:F5AE:80F4:F7F6 (talk) 11:47, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

AlphaCode - comment from Scott Aaronson / the blog Shtetl-Optimized
AlphaCode - comment from Scott Aaronson / the blog Shtetl-Optimized

"AlphaCode as a dog speaking mediocre English"


 * https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=6288

somebody might want to incorporate this into the article

- 2804:14D:5C59:8693:C90B:569:3EFF:444A (talk) 23:01, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Request for removal
Hi,

I'd like to request that the following be removed from the History section:

In December 2019, co-founder Suleyman announced he would be leaving DeepMind to join Google, working in a policy role. In 2021, the Wall Street Journal revealed that Suleyman had been placed on leave at DeepMind in 2019, following an investigation into employees' allegations that he had bullied them. The company hired an external lawyer to investigate allegations that Suleyman had bullied employees, and he was placed on a leave of absence, before leaving to join Google. An email sent to staff after the story broke, published by Business Insider, said Suleyman's "management style fell short" of expected standards. Business Insider also published further details of historical allegations of bullying against Suleyman, including claims that he boasted about "crushing people", "had a habit of flying off the handle out of nowhere", and demanded employees carry out tasks unrelated to their jobs.

This information is already included in the article focused on Mustafa Suleyman, and is both redundant and irrelevant for inclusion in the DeepMind article, which focuses on the history and information surrounding the company itself.

Bringing this to the attention of, who reviewed the edit requests at Talk:Mustafa Suleyman and is therefore familiar with the subject and context.

Thanks for your time, MforSuleyman (talk) 13:47, 27 October 2022 (UTC) MforSuleyman (talk) 13:47, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Sure I'll take a look at this later today or within a couple days Andre🚐 16:21, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ Andre🚐 19:35, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * , thanks for your help! MforSuleyman (talk) 13:01, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Divison of a division?
In the article, GOogle Brain is described as a division of Google AI. But Google AI is itself a division (see Google AI)... Am I missing something? 103.114.126.34 (talk) 08:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
 * You are correct. Google Brain was a division of Google AI, which was a division of Google LLC, which is a subsidiary of Alphabet Inc. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:11, 23 May 2023 (UTC)