Talk:Google Earth/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ankit Maity (talk · contribs) 08:18, 1 May 2013 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Add citations wherever marked. -- Ankit Maity Talk Contribs 08:45, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Along with that, some questions:
 * Some pedestrian walkways and private roads are signified by transparent white lines, especially when greatly resembling a road intended for public automotive traffic.
 * -- I don't get what is white and transparent.
 * Google Earth Engine is a separate product, not a part of Google Earth.
 * -- If it's why have this part at all?
 * -- Ankit Maity Talk Contribs 08:57, 1 May 2013 (UTC)


 * I just removed that section about the engine, undo it if I did wrong. Numbermaniac  - T  - C  22:26, 1 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Oh, and reference 14 has a minor problem. Numbermaniac  - T  - C  22:27, 1 May 2013 (UTC)


 * I corrected that ref for you.
 * And please add those sources wherever marked cn. If you can't find sources, please cancel the statements. -- Ankit Maity Talk Contribs  11:41, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Correct the problems addressed in the editor tag in the para of Google_Earth. -- Ankit Maity Talk Contribs 11:47, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The words "current", "recent" & "to date" should be removed as they become outdated. (GA criteria).
 * Remove Peacock Terms, such as "significant" and "important". (GA criteria)
 * The lead should adequately summarize the content of the article. (GA criteria) -- Ankit Maity Talk Contribs 12:03, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * You have 7 days to try and fix this article.-- Ankit Maity Talk Contribs 06:07, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Setting article review "on hold".-- Ankit Maity Talk Contribs 06:07, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

I'll have to see what I can do. I'm hoping others might help too. Numbermaniac - T  - C  08:59, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Comment by non-reviewer -- this GAN should've been immediately failed for containing 22 tags for citation and two outstanding cleanup banners. @Numbermaniac What the heck were you thinking when you nominated the article? You're not a major contributor to the article. In fact, you've only made ONE (1) edit on the article. You're wasting everyone's time here. Geez --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 07:34, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I added those tags. However, what you said is perfectly correct. -- Ankit Maity Talk <sub style="color:green;">Contribs  12:10, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The article is thus failed for the GA status. -- Ankit Maity <sup style="color:magenta;">Talk <sub style="color:green;">Contribs 12:10, 17 May 2013 (UTC)