Talk:Google Volume One

Additional source
The article as is is based far too much on catalog listings, rather than reliable third-party sources. This is a source that might be used if one might choose to correct that. (I cam across it while trying to check notability on the article, but don't have time to work it in myself at the moment.) --Nat Gertler (talk) 15:01, 17 October 2016 (UTC)