Talk:Gopinath Muthukad

NPOV
The nutral point of view of this article to be maintained to comply to an encyclopeadic content. anybody out there to correct it? Anuandraj (talk) 22:01, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Though the information in the article is cited and correct, the tone of the language used to be corrected to maintain a nutral point of view.Anuandraj (talk) 22:24, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
 * This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
 * There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
 * It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
 * In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:11, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Request for Comments
There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages.

The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person.

Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 09:53, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

NPOV
This page still does not reflect a neutral point of view. It is written more like an advertisement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adhipan (talk • contribs) 06:28, 1 August 2020 (UTC)