Talk:Gordon's School

Marketing, not information
This 'article' transparently reads as a marketing brochure. It does not have the tone, content or neutrality of an encyclopaedia article. It uses jargon (e.g. 'period 6 activity') that has little meaning outside the closed community of the school or, possibly, the UK education community. It suffers from detail and prolixity not suitable for an encyclopaedia article.

I don't know how to do this, but someone should mark the article for a complete rewrite, so far removed is it from the usual brief, informative style of school article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.157.215.120 (talk) 05:51, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Six year on- and I concur. WP does have a rule about deleting unsourced WP:RS material. I am tempted .ClemRutter (talk) 11:03, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Couldn't resist. Added two authoritative sources and will build up a little basic material about what they teach, and hope we can get a little help more help. I have changed the assessmentClemRutter (talk) 16:27, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Notable Gordonians
I am not sure why the entry referring to Daniel Gonzales (spree killer) was removed from 'Notable Gordonians' on August 31st 2021– the entry was correctly referenced to a verifiable source. J.Vande (talk) 17:44, 21 November 2021 (UTC)