Talk:Got Mercury?

Wrong slate!
The wrong slate is linked in the article. I dont know how to fix.

NPOV issue with press section
The press section of the article seems heavily biased against the report this group issued. Surely there must be people outside the group have defended the report? --Cab88 (talk) 15:06, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it looks like most of the wording of that section was taken from a press release from the National Fisheries Institute, certainly not an unbiased source. The paragraph about the New York Times story is largely irrelevant. Got Mercury's 17-page report includes 2 sentences about the New York Times story. And despite our misleading wording, their report doesn't "use" the New York Times story, it simply cites it as an example. The report is based on research done by the Turtle Island Restoration Network, not the New York Times. Kaldari (talk) 22:36, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I've rewritten the section to be more NPOV. Kaldari (talk) 23:11, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Got Mercury?. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100707092433/http://www.seaturtles.org/downloads/STRPAnnualRep2007.pdf to http://seaturtles.org/downloads/STRPAnnualRep2007.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080821105223/http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/FW1005.pdf to http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/FW1005.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)