Talk:Gott der Herr ist Sonn und Schild, BWV 79/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 13:52, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

I'll finish this one soon JAG  UAR   13:52, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * "his third year as Thomaskantor" - should this be italicised, per some other articles?
 * "Bach began the libretto for the feast" - which feast?
 * "the first of these hymns was sung regularly after the sermon on Reformation Day in Leipzig" - needs a link
 * "As Hofmann points out" - sounds a bit informal. Perhaps this could be As Hofmann asserted
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

Once again this article has been exceptionally good. I couldn't find anything worthy of putting this on hold, well done! JAG UAR   22:55, 12 November 2015 (UTC)