Talk:Goucher College/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Taewangkorea (talk · contribs) 19:15, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello! I will be starting this GA review. It is my first GA review so I will mostly follow the criteria. Taewangkorea (talk) 19:15, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Review of the Quick-Fail Criteria
1. It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria

2. It contains copyright violations
 * Copyvio and spot check passed. The violations shown are quotes that are appropriately cited, or specialized terms such as (U.S. Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design).

3. It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include {cleanup}, {POV}, {unreferenced} or large numbers of {citation needed}, {clarify}, or similar tags.

4. It is not stable due to edit warring on the page.

Overall, none of the quick-fail criteria are met. Taewangkorea (talk) 19:26, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Review of the Main GA Criteria
A good article is:  :  ; and . : Please see comments below. 
 * layout - Maybe things in MOS:LEADORDER such as a short description might be added? Also, perhaps a "further reading" and/or "see also" section can be added?.
 * Lead section - the lead should summarize what is discussed in the rest of the article, parts on notable people and the "campus" section should be added. Also, in the lead, "and was one of 40 institutions profiled in Colleges That Change Lives by Loren Pope" is not in the body. Finally, some refs that are in the lead are not talked about in the article, maybe you can try to incorporate some of that stuff into the article.
 * Done. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 00:22, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The lead could use one sentence or so on notable alumni, and it would then be a good summary of the entire article. Taewangkorea (talk) 03:47, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Words to watch - The title of the "recent construction" section might be changed to prevent the usage of the term recent (it may be recent now but not in several years) but I think it is not that important.
 * Done. Incorporate section on construction into rest of article.Wikieditor19920 (talk) 00:22, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Fiction -
 * List Incorporation -

  :  ;  Please see comments below : What reference style is being used? 
 * OK. I guess MoS does not have a specific citation style guide. Taewangkorea (talk) 03:43, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

;  ; : Please see comments
 * On the Design, Layout, and Sustainability section, the source (nrdc.org/experts/lara-ettenson/how-college-campuses-can-lead-fighting-climate-change) says  but the article says " implemented a plan for all new and existing buildings to achieve at least a Silver rating according to the U.S. Green Building Council's" which is different from what the source says (mainly renovations to existing buildings vs all existing buildings.

and</li>
 * Rewrote this segment to conform with your suggestion above. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 00:22, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

<li>.
 * Copyvio detector and spot check passed. Taewangkorea (talk) 21:26, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

</ol></li> <li> : <ol STYLE="list-style-type: lower-alpha"> <li>;: Please see comments
 * Information regarding organization/administration of the university (maybe under Academics section) would be helpful. Also, the "rankings" and "Admissions" and "graduate level" sections under academics might be expanded more. Also, perhaps information regarding faculty research might be added under the "academics" section. Finally, in the student life section, parts regarding "athethics" and "clubs and extracurriculars" sound rather short. Maybe there can be more info added.
 * I can only include what I find in reliable sources, and there is only limited information available to put into these sections. I'm hoping that this article can serve as a good example of how to make proper and efficient use of a subject (institution) with moderate reliable source coverage. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 00:22, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
 * OK. I see. I think it is OK then. Taewangkorea (talk) 03:41, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

and</li> <li>.</li>
 * Uses summary style: Taewangkorea (talk) 03:44, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

</ol></li> <li>. </li> <li>.
 * No edit wars or content disputes. Taewangkorea (talk) 21:26, 27 November 2019 (UTC)</li>

<li> : <ol STYLE="list-style-type: lower-alpha"> <li> ; and</li> <li>.</li> </ol></li> </ol>

Status query
Wikieditor19920, Taewangkorea, where does this review stand? While Wikieditor19920 has made some edits to the article since this review was opened, they have made no response yet on this page to indicate what progress they have made on the particular points raised in the review, and Taewangkorea hasn't edited this review page since December 5. It would be great if this review could become active again. Thanks to you both. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:51, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I wasn't clear that I was supposed to respond on this page. I've made some change and will indicate above. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 00:22, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , I have almost completed the review, and I will do an image review Tuesday, Feb. 4 UTC. Thank you for the wait. Taewangkorea (talk) 03:45, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , I have just completed the review of the images, and there is just one comment that I have above before it will be good to go. Taewangkorea (talk) 03:53, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Sure thing, thank you. Is it up yet? I'm not seeing the comment. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 03:56, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , its regarding the lead. "The lead could use one sentence or so on notable alumni, and it would then be a good summary of the entire article." Taewangkorea (talk) 03:57, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Done! Wikieditor19920 (talk) 04:10, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , I have passed the GA review. Congratulations on helping improve Wikipedia. If you could reciprocate the favor by reviewing any of my current GA noms of Kim Sung-uk or Gongnyong Ridge, that would be great! Taewangkorea (talk) 04:16, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much. I'd be happy to give one of them a go. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 04:38, 2 February 2020 (UTC)