Talk:Governmental leading high school

wikipedia:is not censorship
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Governmental_leading_high_school&diff=992739598&oldid=992675001 Baratiiman (talk) 06:18, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

"Wikipedia: is not censorship" but we shouldn't share wrong information based on our opinion what you mentioned was wrong because 1. the sentence you used is not mentioned in the Persian version 2.the meaning of the sentence you added was not match with the site you refer the site said: the government pays more attention to the students with high intelligence(high IQ) and what government is doing is wrong but you accused intelligent students as rich students that use money and power to get into Competitive examination 3.the site you used mentioned and had information about another school 4.so I didn't censorship information I just deleted the wrong information and at the end, I should say: I haven't deleted all of you edited information because the rest of them were right, or they were similar between (مدارس تیزهوشان) and governmental leading school ROSE1820 (talk)


 * "Third opinion" :
 * 1) @ Baratiiman, I am bit surprised that you deleted my comment informing you of procedure at your talk page. I do have at least one Barnstar of at least one third opinion discussion and my opinion respected by both sides. Any ways still it is your own decision what to have on your talk page. And I would respect that.
 * 2) @ ROSE1820, May be Baratiiman is not perfect enough but google translate suggest that there is some criticism involved. And I would suggest to include criticism whatever it may be if it is related to the schools under discussion.
 * Thanks and warm regards Bookku (talk) 12:01, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the time you put to read the site, but as I mentioned before the criticism is toward Independent school(مدرسه غیر انتفاعی) but, Governmental leading high schools are governed by the government. With regards   ROSE1820 (talk)

About the Third Opinion request: The request for a Third Opinion in regard to this dispute has been removed because a third editor entered the discussion after the request was filed, thus either (depending on how you want to look at it) giving a third opinion or exceeding the only-two-editors requirement for a 3O to be issued. If further content dispute resolution is needed, consider Dispute Resolution Noticeboard or Request for Comment but please be sure to thoroughly read and follow the instructions at those venues. Regards, TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 19:28, 8 December 2020 (UTC) (Not watching this page)