Talk:Gråt Fader Berg och spela/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 09:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

This looks like an interesting article. Based on what I can see of the review of Fram med basfiolen, knäpp och skruva, it may be close to GA already. I will start a review shortly. simongraham (talk) 09:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Many thanks, and I certainly hope so! Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:43, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Assessment
Please ping me when you would like me to look again. simongraham (talk) 09:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC) - I think that's all done now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The article was created on 12 December and is rated as both a B and C class within different wikiprojects.
 * Noted.
 * The article is relatively short, at 802 words of readable prose.
 * Noted.
 * The lead is of appropriate length at 122 words.
 * Thanks.
 * There are no obvious spelling or grammar errors.
 * The publication is not mentioned in the body. I suggest adding a relevant paragraph, possibly after the Lyrics. I note that this is also the case in other articles on songs by this artist. The following facts need to the covered:
 * The date that it was first published.
 * Added.
 * In what publications.
 * That it was No.12.
 * Added.
 * The subtitle.
 * Added.
 * Any further details about the first and subsequent publications.
 * Added.
 * I suggest that the sources in your excellent article Fredmans epistlar should furnish most of this.
 * Indeed.
 * It complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead, layout and word choice.
 * Thanks.
 * Citations seem comprehensive and from reliable sources.
 * Noted.
 * I recommend adding the language= tag to the sources which are not in English.
 * Done.
 * There is no evidence of no original research.
 * Noted.
 * Earwig's Copyvio Detector detects 0% copywrite violation, which is very impressive.
 * Noted.
 * The topic is covered with a neutral point of view.
 * Noted.
 * The article is stable, 100% authored by Chiswick Chap.
 * Noted.
 * Images are public domain and appropriately tagged.
 * Noted.
 * Images have appropriate captions. I recommend adding ALT tags, even though this in not a GA criteria, to the images in the text (the image in the Infobox already has the tag).
 * Noted, and added alt texts.
 * Images have appropriate captions. I recommend adding ALT tags, even though this in not a GA criteria, to the images in the text (the image in the Infobox already has the tag).
 * Noted, and added alt texts.
 * Great work. This article now meets the criteria to be a Good Article.
 * Pass simongraham (talk) 15:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)