Talk:Grace Dieu Manor School

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://gracedieu.com/history-manor-house/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:50, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Abused: Breaking the Silence citations
Not sure how necessary it is to have six citations for that the sentence about Abused: Breaking the Silence. It seems close to citation overkill to me, so maybe, if possible, it should be narrowed to the two or three best ones out of the six. If, however, it the consensus is to keep all of the citations, then maybe they should be bundled so that that single sentence doesn't appear to dominate the entire article. There are eight citations total and six of them are for that particular film so it kind of makes the article appear unbalanced, stylistically speaking.

Bundling the citations could be done as follows:"The abuse was catalogued in the 2011 BBC documentary Abused: Breaking the Silence."

Just a suggest that I feel improves the article's appearance. - Marchjuly (talk) 04:40, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm not averse to multiple citation tags, but am trying your suggestion. Removed the following link because it is dead at this time, not in the Wayback Machine, and I cannot figure out how to make The Tablet's archive section work:
 * The Tablet lists no 17 June 2011 issue&mdash;is the date wrong? Searches on the article title also come up empty.
 * One reason I favor keeping all these citations is some of these sources might provide other information as this article develops. Also, sources are sometimes aggressively challenged for this type of subject, so it's worth having a few spares. / edg ☺ ☭ 01:53, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * One reason I favor keeping all these citations is some of these sources might provide other information as this article develops. Also, sources are sometimes aggressively challenged for this type of subject, so it's worth having a few spares. / edg ☺ ☭ 01:53, 5 December 2015 (UTC)