Talk:Grace of Monaco (film)

Reception
I added a huge section on reception, which was promptly removed. Under the explanation "Removed blog reviews." Now, bloggers are critics that were allowed to review the movie at Cannes. Surely they're allowed to be in the Wiki reception? Also Kidman's role has predominately received praise, why has someone removed 90% of the praise and added in a negative one? That doesn't make it mixed. That means you're manipulating proceedings to make it look mixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.150.51.8 (talk) 19:12, 14 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello, I think we need to make a distinction between amateur bloggers and journalists on newspaper "blogs". For example, TheFilmDivider is an amateur blog, where The Playlist at Indiewire is a professional blog. The Telegraph and The Hollywood Reporter aren't blogs, though, so they can be used. As for Kidman's performance, we cannot compile individual reviews to make a general claim. We need a source that says that reviews have collectively praised her performance. We can't reference two or three reviews and make that claim. Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 19:27, 14 May 2014 (UTC)


 * and, please discuss the matter here. You can't keep reverting each other, and we have enough content here to come up with a compromise. Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 19:54, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Why isn't this there then? http://www.indiewire.com/article/cannes-review-nicole-kidman-is-a-solid-grace-kelly-in-grace-of-monaco-but-is-it-fact-or-fiction — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.150.51.8 (talk) 00:50, 15 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Needs links on UK openings added. 213.152.6.214 (talk) 10:43, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Reception
""Kidman's breathless, blank performance does little to add life or credibility to a script..." This feels like half the quote is missing. Just me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.150.51.8 (talk) 07:34, 17 May 2014 (UTC)