Talk:Graduated driver licensing

Neutrality
I have tagged this with the POV-check tag as it is one sided and does not address the problems and controversy associated with the scheme. It reads as though it is a page of a driver licensing agency's website. --Nztui12 (talk) 07:23, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Removal of POV-check tag and adding of POV tag
I've checked the neutrality myself following the placement of that tag and believe that it does not satisfy the neutral point of view requirements. The main points for my argument are:
 * 1) Introduction: The final sentence lacks a citation so this is meaningless
 * 2) Description: The fifth sentence reads as if it is the writers personal opinion, rather than anything encyclopedic and lacks a single citation.
 * 3) Africa: This section gives a recommendation of the author, without giving any references.
 * 4) Overall: Lack of any real citations, the only 3 references provided are government related ones with clear bias. A lack of any mention of controversy or criticism of these schemes, no disadvantages have been lifted to compare to the (un-cited) advantages.

I plan to fix some of these issues in time, but would appreciate any input and/or assistance in editing the article to a more neutral one. Regards, --Nztui12 (talk) 09:53, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Graduated driver licensing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130518080528/http://www.saferoads4teens.org/standup-act to http://www.saferoads4teens.org/standup-act

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:51, 22 October 2017 (UTC)