Talk:Graduated response

Countries that support Graduated response
The Governments of France, Taiwan, and South Korea have already adopted Graduated response initiatives, and it looks as though the United Kingdom, Ireland, New Zealand and the United States are soon to follow. Should we maintain a section for each country? Wikispan (talk) 20:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC)


 * jep, that would be good, though I think we should try and keep it short.--SasiSasi (talk) 20:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Theirs some indicatiosn that the RIAA may have made a direct pact with ISPS
 * does something trump this?
 * If not its worth knowing. even if it isnt a LAW — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.113.171.23 (talk) 07:03, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Ireland
Some important news today. Ireland Is Latest With Plan to Cut Into Copyright Violations Wikispan (talk) 18:27, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Merger proposal
Graduated response appears to be the universal term. — ThePowerofX 12:34, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Highly biased
This is basicaly a page about how free copying and distribution of knowledge and information is wrong and trying to convince people to filter the Internet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.217.226.133 (talk) 01:26, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * This article doesn't have anything to say about the ethics of file sharing. It simply describes the various initiatives in different countries. In order for the tag to stay, you need to point out specific examples of bias. — ThePowerofX 09:09, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * And presumably this and this is your attempt at balance? — ThePowerofX 09:18, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Well the introduction implies that file-sharing is wrong, which is bias. 20:14, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The introduction was fine until you began editing it.
 * - The word "unlawful" is removed (diff)
 * - The word "wrongly" is added (diff)
 * - Then you slap down a NPOV tag (diff)
 * Seriously? — ThePowerofX 21:32, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Graduated response. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081026090128/http://forbrukerportalen.no/Artikler/2008/ISP%20liability_Norwegian%20Consumer%20Council%20warns%20consumers%20not%20to%20sign%20letter%20of%20guilt to http://forbrukerportalen.no/Artikler/2008/ISP%20liability_Norwegian%20Consumer%20Council%20warns%20consumers%20not%20to%20sign%20letter%20of%20guilt
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081027000900/http://forbrukerportalen.no/Artikler/2008/Norwegian%20Consumer%20Council%20calls%20for%20Internet%20complaint%20board to http://forbrukerportalen.no/Artikler/2008/Norwegian%20Consumer%20Council%20calls%20for%20Internet%20complaint%20board

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:53, 22 October 2017 (UTC)