Talk:Graffiti in Ancient Rome

Merger proposal
I propose that Graffiti in Ancient Rome be merged into Roman graffiti, or that Roman graffiti be merged into Graffiti in Ancient Rome, since both articles cover the same material. I see no reason why the information should be divided into separate articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.79.45.246 (talk) 17:31, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Support   Zoozaz1    talk   18:10, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Support The articles cover the same subject. Ewf9h-bg (talk) 18:23, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge into Roman graffiti: this article is little more than a stub; "Roman graffiti" is more developed, and has a wider scope, not being limited to the confines of Rome itself; and there's no obvious advantage to having a separate article about Roman graffiti at Rome, as opposed to Roman graffiti elsewhere. If further development of the article demonstrates sufficient reason for having one, it can always be split off again.  P Aculeius (talk) 15:18, 21 December 2020 (UTC)