Talk:Graham Colditz

Untitled
Looks like this is to some extent an autobiography, but the subject is undoubtedly notable and the tone of the article isn't too bad. It could do with some decent wikification, and there's probably more stuff out there. Graham, if you're reading this and have more citations/references, please post them here and I'll work on the article. If you keep your edits to the tone you've managed to adhere to so far you won't fall foul of the wikipolice. See the message on your Talk Page for more details.MuppetLabTech (talk) 21:56, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

high h, no longer highest
„According to Google Scholar statistics, Colditz has the highest h-index of any living author“ may have been true in August 2018 (see https://web.archive.org/web/20180731222523/https://www.webometrics.info/en/node/58), but currently Colditz was overtaken by Robert Langer (drug delivery&tissue engineering, https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=5HX--AYAAAAJ), Ronald C Kessler (Psychiatric Epidemiology, https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=EicYvbwAAAAJ), and JoAnn E. Manson (Heart disease and stroke statistics, ... https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=QK07bYEAAAAJ). Soon, Eric Lander (Bioinformatics, Genome research, https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=LXVfPc8AAAAJ) and possibly Frank B. Hu (https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=9Wq1xSUAAAAJ) will overtake him, too.

That is why i replace the sentence by „According to Google Scholar statistics, Colditz has a h-index of more than 300“. --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 19:02, 22 March 2023 (UTC)