Talk:Graham v. Connor

Formatting
This article is difficult to read due to its formatting, with lack of clear subdivisions and organization. It could benefit from reformatting/restructuring to make the article clearer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psykonautiks (talk • contribs) 13:13, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Need more analysis
The bulk of this article is the SCOTUS syllabus, which should be replaced by an analysis written in less technical language, and perhaps some more contextual information (how this case fits into the larger picture of excessive-force cases in the US). We already link to the syllabus, in WikiSource. Peter Chastain  [habla, por favor]  18:50, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Outcome after remand?
The article says case was remanded with instructions for reconsideration. So what was the final outcome? 2604:2D80:ED08:A00:54D:1595:AE98:24FF (talk) 14:59, 14 March 2024 (UTC)