Talk:Gran Atlas Aguilar

Ashibaka wrote: "don't see the anon's problem, this is only reworded and makes no "bibliographic" changes". Well, Mr. or Mrs. Ashibaka: - Gran Atlas Aguilar is NOT a seventh edition of an earlier work since it is completely new. - Atlas Universal Aguilar had NO 166 pages of maps, but – as I wrote, 116. - Who says it was "the most elaborative" atlas of its kind after WW II? It's not reworded, but a wrong translation. In bibliography it's those little things, you know.