Talk:Grand Guignol Orchestra/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: SL93 (talk · contribs) 10:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Well-written: The article is well-written with no prose issues that I can see.
 * Verifiable with no original research: Everything is verified with reliable sources, except for a review that is sourced to an unreliable Wordpress blog.
 * Broad in its coverage: The article is broad in its coverage, without going into unneeded detail. The lead is long enough to accurately summarize the article.
 * Neutral: The article is neutral.
 * Stable: I only see constructive edits over a long period of time.
 * Images: One of the images is fair use and is in the infobox. It is not possible to replace a manga cover with a free use image. The second image is a free use image that is relevant to the article.

The only problem is that one of the reviews comes from an unreliable Wordpress blog. SL93 (talk) 10:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi! Thank you for taking the time to review this article. :) The author of the blog, David Welsh, has been listed by the Anime & Manga wikiproject as a reliable source. Rapunzel-bellflower (talk) 18:19, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Alright. I'm passing this. SL93 (talk) 18:47, 5 August 2013 (UTC)